Jung, Sora and Richter, Heike and Darvin, Maxim and Schanzer, Sabine and Kramer, Axel and Patzelt, Alexa and Meinke, Martina and Lademann, Juergen (2016) Changes of the skin barrier and bacterial colonization after hair removal by clipper and by razor. Journal of Biomedical Photonics & Engineering. 020303-1-020303-7. ISSN 24112844
![[thumbnail of 2997-8312-1-PB.pdf]](http://publications.article4sub.com/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
2997-8312-1-PB.pdf - Published Version
Download (771kB)
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate hair removal increases the risk of surgical site infections which are associated with a higher morbidity and mortality of surgical patients. Here, the effects of a clipping device and a disposable razor on the skin barrier, microbial burden and surface structure were compared. Methods: Changes in bacterial colonization, transepidermal water loss, antioxidant status and the skin surface structure were investigated on the calves of 12 healthy volunteers. Measurement time points were at baseline (tbase) and 24 hours after hair removal (t24). Results: Both, the disposable razor and the clipper showed a decrease in log colony-forming units count from tbase (mean(tbase) ± standard deviation = 2.6 ± 1.27, median ± standard error = 2.6 ± 0.37) to t24 at prazo r= 0.05 and pclipper = 0.06 respectively. At t24 clipping resulted in a higher reduction of log colony-forming units (mean(t24) = 1.76 ± 0.8, median = 1.69 ± 0.23) compared to the use of the disposable razor (mean(t24) = 1.84 ± 0.85, median = 1.91 ± 0.24). Furthermore, the razor-treated group showed an increase in colony-forming units from t0 to t24, whereas clipping lead to a continuous decrease in colony-forming units from t0 to t24. An enhanced appearance of microlesions and a significant increase of transepidermal water loss after shaving using the disposable razor (p = 0.005) were found indicating skin barrier disruptions. Clipping showed no significant effect on transepidermal water loss. Conclusion: Hair removal using the clipping device results in less disruption of the skin barrier compared to the razor, avoiding the development of microlesions. This could be favorable for the prevention of surgical side infections and postoperative wound management.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Academic Digital Library > Multidisciplinary |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email info@academicdigitallibrary.org |
Date Deposited: | 16 Feb 2023 09:13 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jul 2024 07:29 |
URI: | http://publications.article4sub.com/id/eprint/691 |